Zen and many Buddhas and Bodhisattvas
To touch on a very simplified history of Buddhism and Zen, Buddhism takes the historical Buddha Venerable Sakyamuni and his community called the Sangha as its beginning roughly 26 centuries ago, though of course the pursuit of wisdom and some of the practices of Buddhism are much older than that. It flourished and developed in India, split into several schools over generations, then declined, towards the end of its decline in India it spread to China via the silk routes, both north and south, and in China it found a new renaissance based on the platform of Indian thought. Mahayana Buddhism which is translated as ‘Great Vehicle’ teaching became predominant in East Asia. Zen Buddhism has its origins at the beginning of Buddhism, found in the Buddha’s own dialogues the teaching ‘truth beyond words’ of metaphoric understanding or Prajna. Prajna lays at the centre of Zen and life, it is the centre of Venerable Sakyamuni’s teaching and self realization. It may be said that there are two views that may be had, that there is Buddh-ism with its doctrines and forms, and separately Zen, the truth , formless vehicle that lays underneath it. Both are in typical Buddhist fashion true simultaneously. And one might ask why would one need the other? Certainly why would Zen, need Buddhism? To understand that is to understand that all of the Buddha Way is directed to metaphorical understanding. That is the very nature of ascending from Dukka, or the fragmentation of this life, before realising Prajna, or the great metaphorical freedom of realization. Zen cannot be ultimately free of the vehicle of Buddhism because we need a lense for seeing. Buddha as Avatars It’s sometimes surprising to people to note that Buddhism does not have just one Buddha, ‘what is this Amitabha Buddha, and what is he to Sakyamuni Buddha?’ A person might think for years they are looking at a statue of Sakyamuni to be informed one day ‘no that’s Daiichi in fact’. And isn’t that fat guy at the Chinese restaurant Buddha too? In a sense the Buddha Dharma is not represented by one figure alone, but by the family of Buddhas, Bodhisattvas, Guardians, Celestial Beings and Ancestors. Most of this Pantheon originates in India in its recognisable form and is then added to and restyled in China during the Chin and T’ang dynasties. This Pantheon and its evolution is representative of the evolution and depth and breadth of the Dharma teachings. Sometimes the members of the pantheon of Buddhism are stern and wise, sometimes stout or ethereal, serious and humoured. For every ten meter guardian there is a laughing mischievous dancing Buddha. It seems the road to metaphoric understanding is lined with metaphors to be met and understood. It’s also important to understand the Indian concept of the Avatar when examining how Buddhism and Zen treats the many Buddha’s, Bodhisattvas, Guardians, Celestrial beings, messengers etc., that make up its pantheon. Many thousands of years old, not totally exclusive to Indian tradition in the ancient world, the Avatar persists in contemporary Indian spiritual traditions. The Avatar is a concept of being which is not omnipotent or distant in heaven, but a being that manifests facets of humanness. Though Buddhas and Bodhisattvas are not explicitly avatars, the tradition of the avatar is undoubtedly part of the evolution of Buddhism and remains influential in how the Bodhisattva vehicle developed. In some instances we see some pre-Buddhist avatar gods subsumed into Buddhism, some Bodhisattva are original to Buddhism but share the avatar principle in function in Mahayana mythology. So the Buddhist Pantheon is a mix of historic figures and mythological figures who take on tutelary roles. The members of the pantheon function as both personal and other narrative figures. The Historical Buddha Venerable Sakyamuni is for the most part lost to us after 26 centuries, but it seems clear that he, or the people attributed to him, taught in metaphorical narrative, and the role of the Buddhist Pantheon is to continue that tradition. In the Zen school the pantheon of Buddhas and Bodhisattva are representative of the facets of the Buddha’s teaching and the ascent to metaphoric understanding that we might all undertake. According to the Parinirvana sutra which details the last teaching and the dying days of Venerable Sakyamuni, he teaches us finally, ‘in all these years what I have taught you is incomplete, you must find the rest for yourself’ this lays at the heart of Mahayana doctrine. In many other traditions truth is often claimed to be handed down through other being, but in the Mahayana, the ‘Greater Vehicle, the incomplete truth, is not a problem but an opportunity, the nature of the incomplete frees us from what otherwise can be a doctrinal prison so ever present in other traditions, philosophies, superstitions and theories. But it also presents a sweet problem, opportunity, and for that we need a structure, and that is why the Zen school has not evolved separately from Buddhism as its own unique way. Zen is Buddhism its self, at its very heart, the journey into self realization of no self. This brings us to a short note on Zen Buddhism itself, that it is a vehicle not for seeking answers but embracing questions, embracing the unknown, the un-born truth that can’t be shaped and defined except by it’s limitless change and non-change. The very nature of Zen Buddhism is to train, and the training of mind and body is undertaken in the same spirit as Venerable Sakyamuni practiced and by the same way, to embrace Not-knowing Not Abiding ‘Mu-so mu-jyo’. The figures also through visual art make the teachings available to the reach of those who could not read or did not have the time to delve deeply into doctrinal arguments and theories, the Buddhas, Bodhisattvas and others are easily recognized and easily understood for their individual and collective qualities. First of all to start with, Venerable Sakyamiuni Buddha is the historical Buddha that most people are…
